Tag Archives: Sunset District

Mayoral Candidates Take On Park Issues

By Thomas K. Pendergast

In front of a standing-room-only crowd at a recent community meeting, most of the San Francisco mayoral candidates talked about two controversial proposals for the western end of Golden Gate Park that city government is advocating for.

There is a project by the SF Public Utilities Commission (SFPUC), which wants to build a $152 million water treatment plant, in which partially-treated water from the Oceanside plant near the SF Zoo would be subjected to additional treatment before being distributed for non-potable irrigation uses in the park. The water would be used at the Golden Gate Park Golf Course and the California Academy of Sciences.

As well, the plan calls for the pumping of water from an underground aquifer to augment water the City gets from its Hetch Hetchy Reservoir.

Then there’s a proposal from the SF Recreation and Park Commission to install artificial turf and 60-foot-tall lights at the soccer fields near the Beach Chalet restaurant.

Both the water treatment and turf replacement projects are currently under environmental review.

“I would oppose the water plant,” SF Public Defender Jeff Adachi told the forum crowd. “It’s 40,000 square feet. It’s got 30-foot-tall walls. It’s got lights and it’s going to be owned by Homeland Security. That’s not exactly why we come to the park. In terms of the artificial turf and the soccer fields, I don’t think that it’s a good idea to have seven acres of Astroturf; I think that it should be grass.”

Many in the audience burst into applause at this and shouted their approval, although at least one person booed.

“I don’t favor having all these bright lights out there. This is Golden Gate Park. It’s not just a parking lot somewhere.”

Another candidate, Cesar Ascarrunz, said he used to play professional soccer.

“I hate artificial turf. You can kill yourself on it,” he said. “The 60-foot lights, it’s not very proper for Golden Gate Park. San Francisco is a tourist town. Tourists come because San Francisco is the most beautiful city in the world. Millions of people come to see Golden Gate Park. Artificial turf in the Golden Park, I don’t think so. It’s not healthy.”

San Francisco Supervisor John Avalos also expressed a dislike for the proposed artificial turf and lights.

“I’d feel like I was right smack dab in the middle of civilization. We certainly are a civilization, but we would lose a lot by having a park with lights on at night. That could cause a lot of glare for people who live in the area,” Avalos said. “I also don’t really think it’s a good idea to put an industrial use, the water treatment plant, within Golden Gate Park. I think we’d be losing a lot in terms of what the park has to offer.”

Terry Baum, the Green Party candidate, said the water treatment plant went against the goals of those who created the park and she also did not think the artificial turf was healthy for people.

“I have a report here that was done that summarizes the toxic effects of the artificial turf, potentially,” Baum said. “Some of it’s been proven, some of it’s not: severe irritation of the respiratory system, systemic effects on the liver and kidneys, irritation of the eye/skin, cancers, developmental affects. We need these kids to be playing on real grass.”

Board of Supervisors President David Chiu was approaching both issues with an open mind.

“I have a very healthy skepticism of both of these projects,” Chiu said. “With regards to the water treatment plant … I have serious questions about whether we want to put such a heavy-duty industrial use in our park. I’m going to be looking at the EIR (Environmental Impact Report) when it comes to us, through that lens.

“With regards to the soccer fields, I got to tell you, when I was a kid in elementary school I did play soccer as well. I was not a professional soccer player like my fellow candidate but I got to play on real grass. If we can find a real alternative, which is what an EIR is supposed to do, we should look at that very seriously.”

Former SF Supervisor Bevan Dufty did not directly answer the water treatment question but he supports the concept of artificial turf and said a parcel tax would be a good idea to pay for Rec. and Park needs.

“We passed park bonds to renovate our facilities but we don’t have staff at them,” Dufty said. “Now, I’m willing to have an honest conversation, and there’s not a lot of that when you run for office in this town, that we need to talk about a parcel tax dedicated for our Recreation and Park system. … I think we have a responsibility to either pony up and stand up and say you’ll support a parcel tax for the parks or step aside and let’s have fields that kids and young adults can play on because they need something positive.”

Former SF Supervisor Tony Hall, who is running as an independent candidate, joined the majority of the candidates in opposition to both proposals.

“I’ve got seven children. Five of them have gone through college on athletic scholarships. I was very careful as a parent to watch the surfaces they were playing on,” he said. “Cesar’s right. You can’t cut when playing soccer. You can’t curve. Your knees go out on you. And those growing ligaments, it’s so important to play on natural ground. In Golden Gate Park, artificial turf, are you crazy?

Hall would not pump water from the underground aquifer in the park. As a member of the Board of Supervisors Hall helped create a plan for raising the water levels at Lake Merced.

“I know all about water treatment plants. They do not have to pull water from the underground aquifer. In fact, the way we replenished Lake Merced was stopping the extraction of water from the underground aquifer.”

Entrepreneur and candidate Joanna Rees said she’s been canvassing the city in her election campaign.

“What I’ve heard loud and clear from all the neighbors is: ‘We don’t want big bright lights and we don’t want Astroturf.’ And these are the people we should be listening to and supporting,” she said.

“So much of this is due to how we budget because we don’t do bottom-up budgeting in San Francisco, where we go department by department to figure out what’s the investment we have to absolutely make, because we have to support critical services for the community, and what are some things that we’re funding that are no longer meeting their intended purpose and we should not continue to fund,” Rees said.

“There’s no reason in a budget of $6.8 billion, granted we’re a city and a county, for a city of 800,000 people, that we can’t afford to keep our parks and make great open spaces for all in our community,” Rees said.

Other candidates attending the forum, which was held at the Richmond Recreation Center on Sept. 19, included SF Assessor-Recorder Phil Ting, state Sen. Leland Yee, SF City Attorney Dennis Herrera, SF Supervisor John Avalos, Public Defender Jeff Adachi, Paul Currier, and Wilma Pang.

Two candidates, Michela Alioto-Pier and SF Mayor Ed Lee, were invited to the forum but did not attend, citing previous commitments.

Knitters Know about Social Networking

By Judith Kahn

Any Tuesday, walk into the Inner Sunset’s Tart to Tart, located at 641 Irving St., at 7 p.m. and you will see knitters happily chatting away while knitting a scarf, stocking or shawl.
This group is called Purl Jam, and it started about five years ago with two women. It has since expanded to 12 regulars, with occasionally as many as 20 members. Purl Jam is linked to a national knitting group (website: http://www.ravelry.com). Not exclusively for women, men are welcome to join the group and some have.
From time to time, Purl Jam hosts fun workshops where members teach one another specific skills, such as dying yarn or felting. In fact, one member individualized a pattern and the group tested it to see how it worked. The woman then perfected the pattern and sold it online through the national site.
Erica Schultz is a founder of Purl Jam. She came to San Francisco from Washington D.C. in 2005 and began knitting with a friend. From there, the group grew. Schultz describes it as a fun group of knitters and crocheters from all walks of life, ranging mostly in the 20 – 40 age range. With one exception, all members live in San Francisco.
“We chat and catch up with each other’s lives and support people in the group when they run into an unexpected crisis or problem that occurs in their daily lives,” Schultz said.
Purl Jam offers newcomers to the area an opportunity to learn more about the events inside and outside of their neighborhood and a chance to meet new people.
“It is a great place to network,” says Schultz.
Another member, Janice Tauscher, adds: “We don’t only share a love of knitting, but other diverse interests too, like food, the great outdoors, architecture, photography and more. We have fun not just at knit night, but doing other group activities and charity knitting. I like the fact there are skilled knitters in the group; that I am constantly challenged to improve my skills and explore other types of knitting. I love Tuesday night. I can bring in projects for advice and admiration.”
Purl Jam gives back to the community by donating knitted scarves to the St. Anthony Holiday Drive, knitting bears for the Mother Bear Project, collecting knitted garments, such as hats and scarves, for local teen shelters through an organization called Compassion Knit, and collecting yarn for afghans. (For more information about donating yarn, go to the website at afghansforafgahans.org.)
The group gave hand-knitted hats to Tart to Tart employees as a thank you for letting them use the shop.
One of the biggest events of the year for the group is the Bay Area Ravelry Meet–up. In this event, the Ravelry community meets at the Women’s Building in the Mission District and spends the afternoon knitting, crocheting and demonstrating their skills.
To learn more about Purl Jam, contact Schultz at erica.schultz@yahoo.com or go to the blog at http://purljamsf.com or the website at http://purljamsf.com.


Picasso Exhibit Covers Some 70 Years of Artist’s Career

By Ryder W. Miller

For those interested in learning about painting, they will not need to visit Paris this summer, as others have traditionally done in the past, since many of the paintings of one of the greatest painters of the 20th century have been brought here to the City by the Bay.

On display at the M.H. de Young Memorial Museum through Oct. 9 is “Picasso, Masterpieces from the Muse’e National Picasso, Paris,” which provides a retrospective of one of the most famous and influential painters of last century. The French museum is currently closed for renovation so many of its exhibits hit the road.

Many of Picasso’s creations are available to the public, who can see his contribution and influence in this 70-year retrospective is evident.

As noted in the de Young show, Picasso did not keep a regular written diary. Instead, he painted it. He was the biggest collector of his own works, but eventually donated 3,600 paintings to the French government.

Picasso (1881-1973), originally from Spain, is an inspiring figure because he initially did not succeed as a painter in Paris. But, after a few tries he found success, and later fame and fortune.

Like others of his time, Picasso traveled to France to learn how to paint. Once there, he helped create the beginning of the Modern Art movement.

He also worked in a variety of forms as shown in the display. There are some of his famous paintings, but not the blockbuster paintings “Guernica” or “Les Demoiselles d’Avignon.” There are, however, studies for some of those famous paintings.

On the local scene, the public can see a tribute to “Guernica” at the bicycle store on the corner of Stanyan and Frederick streets, at the southeast corner of Golden Gate Park.

It is difficult to follow the entirety of Picasso’s life in one exhibit, expecially since Picasso produced so much art during his long career. He started painting realistic figures before he got caught up in the desire to capture representational abstractions.

Picasso was a child prodigy whose father taught painting.

Gertrude Stein wrote that Picasso was the first to really see and understand the 20th century. This was a time in which almost everything was destroyed.

Although Picasso is the man who is credited with helping create Cubism, he did get some help, including from artist Georges Braque.

Included in the de Young exhibit are a couple of self portraits, including “The Artist before his Canvas” (1938) and “Self Portrait in Straw Hat” (1938).

The odd eyes, noses and figures in motion begin here in 1907. The odd eyes bring attention to the way we and others see each other and the world.

Some women may have been bothered by the way they were represented in Picasso’s paintings, but the strange representations were an abrupt change in the way portraitures and traditional nudes were perceived.

According to John Berger, Picasso could “see himself only when reflected in a woman.” He had many mistresses and models over the length of his life and the public is left with his unusual “diary,” some entries of which were about women fighting over him. His early paintings included attractive nubile forms having fun at the shore.

Over the years, Picasso excelled in all sorts of painterly forms as well as collage and sculpture.
Art novices may not recognize many of the works on display, but together they paint a portrait of an innovative thinker who could represent his ideas in a visual medium.

As the exhibit states, Picasso “dissolved barriers” and “transformed art.” He was an explorer and a bit of a stranger, being a painter among writers early in his career, and a Spaniard living amongst the French. Ultimately, he created a place for himself in the history of art.

Paul Kozakiewicz: Happy Birthday Beacon

Wow, has it already been 20 years?

When Chris Rivers and I started the Sunset Beacon in July 1991, we hoped the newspaper would continue to serve the Sunset for many years to come. Our dreams came true.

When we first hit the streets, Chris was out hustling ads and pulling in good stories. The newspaper was regularly 28 to 32 pages at that time and we were working hard just to keep the quality up. After an ill-fated attempt to publish a citywide newspaper from 1995 to 1997, Chris and I decided to part ways so I purchased Chris’ half of the paper.

Since then, a loyal group of talented writers and photographers have been plugging away, working to create the best newspaper possible to serve the needs of the Sunset and to create a sense of community among its diverse residents. We cover the Zoo, Sunset and Golden Gate parks, community organizations, land use decisions, politics, Ocean Beach, mass transit issues, law enforcement and much more.

The current crop of reporters, columnists and photographers are listed in the staff box of every issue, and I thank them profusely for the hard work they do.

Other writers over the years who have made outstanding contributions to the newspaper are Alan Saracevic, Carol Dimmick, Eric Louie, Dana Perrigan, Tom Prete, Eric Tyson, Laura Jacoby-Chatham, Meg Dixit, and Woody LaBounty.

A special thanks, too, to Greg Gaar, the historian who supplies us with vintage photographs of our neighborhood; Peter Tangermann, who takes care of the door-to-door distribution; Philip Liborio Gangi, our photo editor since day one; and Glenn Gulmes, publisher of the West Portal Monthly for his help editing.

Concerning columnists, we are fortunate to get monthly reports from our local police captain, district supervisor and other elected officials, like state Sen. Leland Yee and Assemblywoman Fiona Ma. We also get guest columns from many sources, including the SF Department of the Environment.

Another big “thank you” has to go out to the merchants who support the newspaper. Without them, there would be no newspaper.

Some, like Dr. Thomas Thickett, real estate agents Pat Sun, John M. Lee, Diana Matson Smith and Billie Soward, Peg Wallace at Elevation Pilates, Dan Hountalas at the Cliff House and the proprietors at Oceanview Dental and Kiki Japanese Restaurant, deserve a special thanks because they have supported us for most of the 20 years we’ve been in business. Many others have come and gone during that time, but their continual support contributes to the ongoing success of the paper. One such example is the University of California, San Francisco, whose departments use us to communicate with Sunset residents about numerous topics and concerns.

Please tell our advertisers how much you value their support for the local scribes.

On a final note, I would like to thank all of the community leaders and residents of the Sunset who continually tell me about important stories and events and noteworthy people living amongst us. Without your help, it would be impossible to write the first draft of the Sunset District’s history.

Thank you.

Paul Kozakiewicz is the publisher of the Sunset Beacon. Back issues of the newspaper, back to 2001, are available on the website at http://www.sunsetbeacon.com.

By Thomas K. Pendergast

Jennifer Chang and Lisa Dazols left their home in the Sunset District to embark on a year-long journey around the globe that will take them to three continents and two subcontinents, and through at least 17 countries and 24 cities, to find what they call “supergays.”

“Anyone who is gay and is out is taking a stand, whether or not they want to be, is an activist, in a way, because they’re doing something pretty radical,” said Dazols. “But, we would define supergay as someone who is doing something pretty extraordinary for the community, whether it be in the arts, in business and community organizing or non-profit work.”

For the next 12 months the couple will be traveling through Australia, Asia, India, Africa and South America, blogging on their website Out and Around about their adventures and the supergays they meet. Chang expects their experiences will change that definition to some extent.

“We realize that as we go abroad our definition of what a supergay might look like will change and be very different and what being “out” means in these countries can be very different than what it means in, say San Francisco,” Chang said. “So, I think our understanding and our definition of that will evolve as we travel.”

Dazols explained that they’re seeking role models for the lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) community.

“We know that we have some role models but we still lack everyday people that our youth can look up to,” she said. “We also want to help decrease homophobia, so by telling peoples’ stories, by telling our own stories, we hope to familiarize people with everyday gay life. And we’d also like to raise issues about things that are going on in the developing world that we’re not too familiar with here in the U.S.

Chang said they plan to visit a lot of developing countries in the southern hemisphere.

“These are places that being gay you can face a lot of potential consequences and so we wanted to highlight issues in those countries,” she explained.

Dazols was a social worker in HIV counseling for the past decade and last worked in San Francisco General Hospital. Chang has taken a leave of absence from her job at EBay to go on the year-long journey.

“I think that we wanted to contribute in a bigger way,” said Dazols. “I know in my job I was doing a lot of band-aid work in terms of counseling and helping and I wanted to do something where a message of hope could get out on a bigger scale. That’s why I wanted to step out and try something new like this.”

Chang agrees.

“There’s a lot of depressing stories out there, especially with regard to the LGBT community, between suicides and bullying and all that,” Chang said. “We really want to focus on the positive stuff, you know, people who are living thriving and happy lives, people who are really pushing for change.”

They both acknowledge that they are hitting the road at a time when much seems to be changing in the LGBT community throughout the world, though they did not intentionally time their trip for that reason. It just worked out that way.

“In terms of timing, it just seems like every day, whether it’s New York passing same-sex marriage or the United Nations standing for human rights in terms of protecting gays and lesbians abroad, we feel like there’s so much to write about, so much to research and look into that we’re very fortunate,” Dazols said. “We’re very hopeful that in a short time we’ll be able to get married in California and life will be very different for our kids.”

Travel expenses are coming out of the couple’s savings but they plan to produce video interviews along the way for a short documentary film, which is only about half funded.

“We want to use this documentary after we come back, to speak about global gay issues,” said Chang.

The public can follow the adventures of the couple or make a donation toward their project by going to the website at www.outandaround.com.

John M. Lee: Mid-year Real Estate Update

As I write this column, the first half of 2011 is just about over. We have had a volatile stock market, rising the first quarter and suffering through a six-week decline of late, bringing the indexes right back to where they were at the beginning of the year. But what about the real estate market? Let us look at some data and really decide for ourselves where the market is at currently and try to figure out where it will be going.

I examined the single-family home markets in the Richmond and Sunset districts because these two markets generally track very closely together and compared them against the data in San Francisco as a whole.

For the first six months in 2011, 89 single-family homes sold in the Richmond versus 79 in 2010, an increase of 12.7 percent. The median price went from $1,020,000 in 2010 to $1,000,000 in 2011, a decrease of 2 percent. The average days on the market decreased by one day, from 64 days to 63 days. Thus, sales activity picked up somewhat this year with prices staying about the same.

The Sunset, however, showed a different trend. There were 176 homes sold during the first six months in 2010 versus 193 in 2011, an increase of 9.7 percent. The median price, however, decreased from $736,500 in 2010 to $660,000 in 2011, a decline of 10.4 percent. The average days on the market went from 56 to 67 days in 2011, a 16 percent increase in marketing time. So, in the Sunset sales activity picked up but the median price decreased, primarily due to more lower-priced homes on the market and a longer time needed to sell a home.

As a comparison, in San Francisco as a whole, the number of single-family home sales decreased by 1.6 percent and the median price decreased by 6.8 percent over the first six months of this year compared to last year. I interpret that to mean as compared to the City as a whole, the west side of town is more active in terms of sales activity, with fluctuating prices.

All numbers show that our market bottomed out in 2009, and that we are up from that point, though our prices have flattened out.

Nationally, the numbers are also mixed, a similar trend we are detecting in San Francisco. Some of it is due to the expiration of the tax credits that ended the first half of last year. Another factor that is affecting the market is the continual high unemployment rate. Though we are off from the peak, unemployment is still in the 9 percent range.

The recent financial crisis in Greece and the decline in our stock market also wiped out part of the funds that would have been used as downpayments for properties. Foreclosures have decreased partly because the government has been pressuring lenders to modify loans and approve short sales instead of letting homes go to foreclosure. However, that strategy might only push foreclosure sales back to a later time.

So, my advice is that if you are thinking about buying and staying in the property for the next five years or more, this is a great time to purchase as prices are good and interest rates are down, resulting in higher affordability. If you are thinking about trading up, it is a great time to do it because though you are selling at slightly lower prices than a few years ago, you are also purchasing at a much lower price, and you will come out ahead on the trade. If you are thinking of a straight sale, you will be getting a slightly higher price than what you would have received the last couple of years.

As always, I strongly recommend you consult with a Realtor, accountant and perhaps an attorney prior to making any real estate decisions.

John M. Lee is a top-selling broker at Pacific Union. For questions regarding real estate, call him at (415) 447-6231.

Supervisor Carmen Chu: Budget Update, Ped Safety

Time to Adopt City Budget
July marks the month when the SF Board of Supervisors adopts the City’s spending plan for the new fiscal year. As the chair of the Budget Committee, I spent the months leading up to July meeting with many community members and organizations, and listened to their concerns as we worked to close a $306 million budget deficit. As each year in recent times has proven true, balancing the city’s budget is no easy endeavor as we strive to preserve important services for our residents while maintaining fiscal responsibility.

As budget chair, I have made it a priority to foster a fair and transparent budget process and to produce a budget that will ensure financial viability for our City in future years. I would like to thank everyone who provided their feedback during this process, whether it was through attending a budget Town Hall Meeting in the neighborhood, contacting our office directly, or by speaking in front of the Budget Committee at City Hall.

Pedestrian Safety Improvements
Those of you who frequent our local Java Beach Cafe or live near La Playa and Judah Street may have noticed a few changes to the intersection recently. The intersection is a unique one in our City, where a two-car Muni light rail vehicle (LRV) is often parked in the middle of the street. This situation has contributed to safety hazards for pedestrians, bikers and drivers. I worked with neighbors through a series of community meetings to discuss ideas for improving safety at the intersection, and we explored alternatives such as relocating the rest area for the N-Judah train and installing crosswalks with flashing lights when pedestrians are in the intersection. What resulted were ideas for initial improvements we could make, given limits in resources and feasible ideas.

Thanks to the generosity of two companies who decided to contribute during these tough economic times and the SF Department of Public Works, we were able to make two improvements to the intersection. Flint Trading and Chrisp Company donated supplies and labor to create a high-visibility pedestrian crosswalk in front of the cafe. The in-laid brick pattern within the reflective crosswalk provides drivers a more clear delineation of a pedestrian’s path of travel. Additionally, next to the median area by the newly-created La Playa Park (southwest corner of intersection), the Department of Public Works installed two large planter boxes to prevent vehicles from squeezing by and making dangerous maneuvers when an N-Judah train is parked in the intersection. We hope to build upon these changes over time to improve safety for everyone.

Throughout the years, our office has pursued many pedestrian safety improvements for our district. These have included the installation of median gardens at Yorba Street and 35th and 36th avenues, speed radar signs, newly-striped crosswalks by schools, and traffic medians along Noriega Street.

Coming soon, there will be a change in the driving speed limit around all schools in the City. A new policy was passed by the SF County Transportation Authority, which requires the driving speed to be 15 m.p.h. around all schools in San Francisco. Signs will be installed around schools in two phases in July and March.

Sunday Streets Returns to the Great Highway
Get ready for Sunday Streets on July 10! Our office will be out on the Great Highway, and we hope to see you there, too. Sunday Streets is a great activity for friends and family, and free bicycle rentals will be available. The car-free route runs from Crossover Drive in Golden Gate Park all the way to the San Francisco Zoo. For more information about Sunday Streets, visit the website at http://www.sundaystreetssf.com.

Supervisor Carmen Chu is the District 4 supervisor, and can be reached at (415) 554-7460 or chustaff@sfgov.org.

Giant Visits Sick Youth

Former SF Giant Barry Bonds made a surprise visit to the University of California, San Francisco’s Benioff Children’s Hospital to cheer up staff, patients and the families of children receiving treatment.

Bonds, the all-time home run leader in Major League Baseball, visited the Barry Bonds Family Foundation Playroom on June 23 before heading to the hospital to cheer up sick children.

“UCSF Benioff Children’s Hospital is thrilled to have the ongoing support of Barry Bonds and the Barry Bonds Family Foundation,” said Kimberly Scurr, interim executive director of UCSF Benioff Children’s Hospital. “Through Barry’s generosity, our playroom has been completely renovated and is one of the most popular spaces in the hospital. A frequent visitor to the hospital, Barry has developed close ties with our kids, families and staff over the years, and has put smiles on the faces of many young patients.”

UCSF Benioff Children’s Hospital tries to create an environment where children and their families find compassionate care at the forefront of scientific discovery, with more than 150 experts in 50 medical specialties serving patients throughout Northern California. The hospital admits about 5,000 children each year, including 2,000 babies born in the hospital. For more information, visit the website at http://www.ucsfbenioffchildrens.org.

Park Arboretum to Build New Nursery

By George McConnell

In the works since 1995, with detailed planning beginning about four years ago, Golden Gate Park’s Strybing Arboretum will soon boast a new $13.1 million hothouse and nursery complex.

In an era of budgetary restrictions, that might seem like an extravagance. In this case, however, patrons of the popular 70-year-old arboretum are the beneficiaries of generous gifts as private donations will fund the entire project, according to Michael McKechnie, executive director of the San Francisco Botanical Garden Society, an organization which raises funds to support the garden.

The nursery it replaces dates back 45 years. The new nursery is large, totaling 9,860 square feet, and will provide ample room for expansion. The typical six-room Victorian flat in San Francisco is about 1,500 square feet, so that gives you an idea of its size, McKechnie said.

Currently planned for the southwest corner of the arboretum, near the Children’s Garden located between 14th and 15th avenues, the new nursery will not be visible from the entrance of the arboretum. But for those who work there, its addition and operations will be deeply felt. The arboretum cultivates more than 7,500 plant species from around the planet, each with individual growing requirements, such as soil, water and climate, that must be taken into consideration.

There will be three components to the nursery, according to McKechnie: a hothouse for initial cultivation, a shadehouse where plants are transferred after successfully taking root and await transplantation, and a headquarter house.

Temperatures inside the nursery will vary, with heated tables holding the seedlings of a wide variety of plants, from rhododendrons, ferns, horsetails, heathers, aloes, wild ginger and California poppies, to the more exotic, such as Japanese anemone, Mexican sage brush, Chinese paperbush, blue bamboo, Chilean bellflower and Darwin barberry, a plant originally collected by Charles Darwin in 1835.

Although it is a working facility and will be closed to the public, people can get an in-depth look at some of the work that goes on behind the scenes at public observation sections in the nursery, McKechnie said.

The idea for an arboretum began in 1926 with a large donation from a wealthy San Francisco benefactor, Helene Strybing, for the creation of a botanical garden. Planning and work began in the 1930s as funds gradually became available. It officially opened in 1940.

Because summer days typically remain under 80 degrees and only a few winter nights are colder than 40 degrees in San Francisco, the arboretum’s collection features trees and shrubs that few botanical gardens can grow outdoors, according to McKechnie.

The 55-acre arboretum is a work in progress, said McKechnie, who has been the executive director for nearly 10 years. Today, he believes it is on the cusp of a Renaissance.

Strybing is one of a handful of public gardens worldwide to have a significant collection of Southern Hemisphere plants with its Chilean, New Zealand, Australian and South Africa gardens, which were all part of the original Gondwana Continent.

Currently, the arboretum is finishing the design for its Southeast Asian Cloud Forest Garden, which will incorporate 19th century Thai artifacts from the Doris Duke Foundation and a collection of plants collected in the highlands of Vietnam, Indonesia, Philippines and mainland Southeast Asia.

About 1.5 million visitors pass through the arboretum’s gates each year. In addition, more than 10,000 San Francisco public school students visit each year and more than 2,500 attend classes. Admission is free.

Cars Sideswiped on 19th Avenue

By Thomas K. Pendergast

Eight months after lines were painted along the outer edges of traffic lanes on 19th Avenue to designate street parking, city officials are proclaiming the program a success. But, since the change and a crackdown on vehicles parking on a portion of the sidewalk, residents along the busy avenue have been getting their vehicles sideswiped.

This past May and June, the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) painted edge lines all along 19th Avenue, in both directions, from Lincoln Way to Wawona Street, to designate legal parking areas along the busy thoroughfare.

Before then, many people parked their cars with a portion on the street and a portion on the sidewalk, to avoid getting their vehicles clipped by traffic on the busy avenue.

After the lines were painted, enforcement of the parking laws against blocking sidewalks began.

Sunset District Supervisor Carmen Chu indicated that although she’s sympathetic to the parking issues that residents face on 19th Avenue, there are others to consider, like disabled people. When she kicked off a publicity campaign to raise awareness about this issue about a year ago, she was joined by representatives from the Rose Resnick Lighthouse for the Blind, Independent Living Resource Center and Senior Action Network, all of whom were concerned that the cars on the sidewalk were blocking and impeding disabled and elderly people.

“All these things have been part of the greater conversation. It’s long been the practice to park on the sidewalk,” Chu said. “I completely understand that 19th Avenue is very narrow and sometimes people can get their side mirrors swiped off. The Department of Transportation (DPT) said there needs to be demarcation before they start to enforce the parking rules there, so that people would know where they could legally park. So, number one, it’s a safety issue and number two, we need to make sure that people with disabilities are able to use the sidewalk.”

Phillip Cory, a resident on the 1400 block of 19th Avenue, agrees that it’s a safety issue but not that the edge lines make anyone safer.

“I think it’s not safe because when you open your (driver’s side) door you step out into a really busy thoroughfare,” Cory said. “My car got totaled. It got rear ended a few months ago by a hit-and-run driver. We used to park with our tires on the sidewalk and we weren’t stepping out of our cars into traffic.”

Some people have suggested there is another motivation, however, that might have played a role in the crackdown. Money collected by DPT from parking tickets all goes to the San Francisco Municipal Transportation Authority (SFMTA), which runs the bus system. To keep itself afloat financially, recently Muni cut service, redesigning routes and increasing parking meter hours. The transit agency keeps parking money revenue for its operations.

Judson True, a spokesperson for the SFMTA, denied that the crackdown had anything to do with making more money to run the bus system, and said that there are no quotas for tickets. To his knowledge, he said, no one is keeping track of how many tickets have been written for parking on the sidewalk on 19th Avenue or how much money the SFMTA has made from those tickets since the stepped-up enforcement began in June.

He noted that it’s never been legal to park half on the sidewalk, but before the edge lines were painted it also was not clear where cars should be parking. He estimated that before the crackdown, about two-thirds of the cars parked along the avenue were parked illegally on the sidewalk. He now estimates those cars at less than 10 percent.

So, although immediately after the edge lines were painted there was a sharp increase in ticketing for parking on the sidewalk, it’s probably not as much now.

“The purpose is changing the behavior and that’s been successful, as far as we’re concerned, and that’s the bottom line,” True said. “We don’t really need the level of enforcement that we did because essentially it’s a problem that’s been solved.”

Jason Jiang, a resident of the 1500 block of 19th Avenue, indicated that to him it was more a case of a solution looking for a problem.

“I think the situation beforehand wasn’t too bad. People parked on the sidewalk but it didn’t really block anyone and I don’t think it was a big issue because it was the vehicles of the owners who lived here,” Jiang said. “I don’t think it was blocked so much that a wheelchair can’t come by here.”

Jiang admitted that flyers were on cars up and down the avenue warning of the crackdown, but he added: “If your vehicle wasn’t parked on the street on that day, you didn’t receive the warning. We were all a bit surprised when they started giving out tickets because it was pretty sudden and a lot of people were very displeased about the policy, that they suddenly decide to draw a line and not have people park their vehicles safely.”

Anne Marie Nixon said she’s lived on the 2000 block of 19th Avenue for seven years.

“As far as I could see on my block the sidewalk’s always wide enough for anyone to go down them,” she said.

Nixon said so far she’s managed to avoid getting a ticket or getting her car clipped, but her housemate wasn’t so lucky about three months ago.

“His truck got crashed into. I guess in the middle of the night somebody sideswiped it and drove off. He was parked within that white line, legally. It was a pickup truck so he had to replace its bed because the whole side of it was ripped open.”

Patrick Keelan, who lives on 19th Avenue near Taraval Street, said he had no warning about the crackdown. Instead, he found out about it when he got a ticket. He also thinks his upstairs neighbors got their car sideswiped a couple of months ago.

“One day I heard a loud crash and I could hear the guys upstairs running around and cussing.”

Later, he noticed their car had been damaged on 19th Avenue, on the side nearest to traffic.